• Users Online: 225
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 


 
 Table of Contents  
REVIEW ARTICLE
Year : 2020  |  Volume : 36  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 102-113

Social cognition: Concept, evaluation, and application in psychiatry


Department of Psychiatry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India

Date of Submission12-Aug-2019
Date of Acceptance22-Oct-2019
Date of Web Publication27-Jun-2020

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Jitender Aneja
Department of Psychiatry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, Rajasthan - 342 005
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/ijsp.ijsp_84_19

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 


Social cognition (SC) serves an interface between psychology and cognitive neuroscience and its conceptualization has evolved over years. SC broadly refers to a process of encoding and decoding the social information, i.e., how a person thinks about himself/herself and others in his/her social world. The refinement of various constructs of SC as well as the assessment tools has contributed to its better understanding and application in psychiatry. At present, major research groups in this field have agreed on that emotion perception, social perception, theory of mind, and attributional style to be the key domains of SC. A marked growth of evidence for the deficits in SC in various psychiatric disorders has led to the development of a plethora of evaluation tools. Although it has been largely studied in schizophrenia and autism spectrum disorders, lately, an increasing number of researches have been conducted in other psychiatric as well as neurological disorders. Consequent to the evidence of deficits in various domains of SC in psychiatric disorders, a number of targeted interventions have been devised. This article provides an overview of the evolution of concept, definition, and domains of SC, its evaluation, and application in psychiatry.

Keywords: Application, concept, measurement, mental disorders, psychiatry, social cognition


How to cite this article:
Singhai K, Kuppili PP, Aneja J. Social cognition: Concept, evaluation, and application in psychiatry. Indian J Soc Psychiatry 2020;36:102-13

How to cite this URL:
Singhai K, Kuppili PP, Aneja J. Social cognition: Concept, evaluation, and application in psychiatry. Indian J Soc Psychiatry [serial online] 2020 [cited 2020 Sep 29];36:102-13. Available from: http://www.indjsp.org/text.asp?2020/36/2/102/288115




  Introduction Top


The enigma of human thinking and behavior has since long allured and challenged the field of psychology. Even more enthralling has been the arcane underpinning interlink between thought processes and behavior, particularly in social situations. The sub-branch of social psychology as defined by Gordon Alport is an attempt to understand how the thought, feeling, and behavior of individuals are influenced by the actual, imagined, or implied presence of others. Diving into finer details of social psychology came the concept of social cognition (SC) with its myriad of implications in the field of psychiatry. In this article, an overview of concepts of SC, its assessment, and application in psychiatry is provided.


  Concept of Social Cognition Top


Definition

The impairments in SC observed in various psychiatric illnesses have greatly perturbed patients, families, and mental health professionals alike. Over years of research, it is now established that SC is functionally distinct from traditional neurocognitive domains. Defining and understanding SC has been yet another field of diverse opinions. Beginning from a psychological understanding and progressing to neural mechanisms, there is no shortage of assortments. Indeed, this heterogeneity has been the cause of various obstacles to research in this area and to tackle the same; the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH), in 2006, held a meeting to resolve the controversies in definition and assessment of SC.

The field of social psychology generally puts SC as the manner in which we interpret, analyze, remember, and use information about the social world.[1],[2] It conceptualizes SC in terms of heuristics, schemas, models of social thought, interplay between affect and cognition, and sources of error. Detailed description of each is beyond the scope of the article and the reader is suggested other references for the same.[3],[4]

On the other hand, the NIMH group defined SC as the mental operations that underlie social interactions, including perceiving, interpreting, and generating responses to the intentions, dispositions, and behaviors of others.[5]

Neurobiologically, Brothers proposed a neural system of SC that was composed of the orbitofrontal cortex, the superior temporal sulcus, and the amygdala.[6] This signature article has given impetus to various studies, which have majorly confirmed its findings. Pinkham, in his article in 2014, emphasized on particular neural areas, each believed to be responsible for selective aspects of SC, but also interacting with each other to form a collective network.[7] He implied the fusiform gyrus, superior temporal sulcus, amygdala, medial prefrontal cortex, and ventrolateral prefrontal cortex to be the main areas involved in forming a neural network of SC.

Evolution of concept of social cognition

The concept of SC dates back to the 1970s and 80s, when Taylor in 1981 claimed that SC was only about 5 years old.[8] He defined it as “any work that emphasizes how an individual cognizes his or her social world.” In 1982, the journal Social Cognition was established to serve as a new forum for the ever-increasing numbers of research in this emerging field. In 1990, as aforementioned, Brothers gave a new dimension to SC, proposing neural modules for the same which has since sparked a separate arena of research.[6]

In 1991, the psychological aspects of SC got a further boost when Fiske and Taylor, in their 2nd edition on the series in social psychology, compiled the theories, evidences, and practical aspects of SC.[3] They combined new developments in cognitive psychology on attention, memory, and inference, with those emerging from the study of attitudes, affect, and motivation.

Talking specifically about SC in individual mental disorders, although multiple researchers were at work already, Combs et al., in 2007, illustrated its role in schizophrenia.[9] Since then, various research aspects of assessments and interventions of SC in schizophrenia have garnered significant attention worldwide. Other disorders where SC has been implicated with substantial literature available are autism spectrum disorders (ASDs), bipolar affective disorder, substance use disorder, and personality disorders.

At around the turn of the century, the NIMH launched the initiative named Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS), which supports the development of pharmacological agents to improve cognition in schizophrenia, and one of the goals of which was the development of a consensus battery for measuring cognition in schizophrenia and the results were first published in 2004.[10] SC was ultimately included as one of the seven domains represented in the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery for clinical trials in schizophrenia.

The importance of the clinical assessment of cognitive abilities involved in social functioning has been recently recognized in the 5th edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, which includes SC as one of the six core neurocognitive domains.[11],[12]


  Evaluation of Social Cognition Top


SC, in its essence, is a vast field. There is consensus in relation to SC, that it is a multidimensional construct comprising many domains. Research pertinent to the field of psychiatry, SC, and its various measures has mainly focused on schizophrenia and ASD, though the research and its results have then been extrapolated to various other disorders.[13] In 2006, the NIMH held a meeting to discuss various issues related to SC in schizophrenia. Researchers in the meeting suggested five broad measures for the measurement of SC in schizophrenia, namely theory of mind (ToM), social knowledge, social perception, attributional style, and emotional processing. To address the problem of the heterogeneity regarding the number, priority, and value in the various measures, an extensive two-step survey of researchers in the fields of schizophrenia, social psychology, and autism was conducted, namely the Social Cognition Psychometric Evaluation study.[14] This process, published in 2013, derived four main domains for the study of SC in schizophrenia, namely, emotional perception, ToM, social perception, and attributional style. The study also suggested two novel constructs: social metacognition and social reciprocity. However, the four main domains discussed remain the area of focus of research pertaining to SC in schizophrenia in particular and other mental disorders in general.[7]

These four constructs shall remain the main area of discussion in the subsequent sections on assessment of SC and its applications in the field of psychiatry. A brief description of these constructs and the various tools available to asses them is provided in [Table 1] and [Table 2]. The list of tools provided here includes those with a historical importance or those which have some psychometric research on reliability and validity.
Table 1: Description of the domains of social cognition

Click here to view
Table 2: Tests for various domains of social cognitions

Click here to view



  Application Of Social Cognition In Psychiatry Top


Research on impairment of SC in psychiatry is garnering attention globally. A systematic review of meta-analyses studying SC across 30 psychiatric, neurodevelopmental, and neurological illness stands testimonial to the growing body of evidence.[63] SC has been largely studied in schizophrenia and ASDs among various psychiatric illnesses. SC and interventions targeting SC in psychiatric illnesses are summarized hereunder.

Social cognition in schizophrenia

Green et al. found that social cue perception and emotional regulation are consistently impaired in patients with schizophrenia.[64] In contrast, emotional experience was found to be intact with inconclusive results about sharing of experience. Fett et al. conducted a meta-analysis of 52 studies assessing association between SC, neurocognition, and functional outcomes (community functioning, social behavior in the milieu, social problem-solving, and social skills).[65] Significantly greater association was found between SC and functioning compared to neurocognition. Association of greater effect size was found between the functional outcomes and ToM, social perception, and emotional processing in descending order. Significant correlation was obtained consistently for ToM and community functioning. However, in contrast, a recent study on patients with early stage schizophrenia (assessed within 5 years of onset) from India failed to find any significant association between SC and functioning.[66]

Effect of interventions targeting social cognition in schizophrenia

A meta-analysis of 19 randomized controlled trials assessing the effect of interventions focusing on at least one element of SC reported that significant improvement was noted only in constructs of facial affect recognition (moderate to large effect size) followed by ToM (small effect size). No significant improvement was noted in domains of attributional style and social perception. SC training interventions were significantly associated with better functioning (moderate to large effect size) in community as well as institution.[67] A review of 16 controlled studies assessing comprehensive SC training programs specifically reported significant improvement in constructs of facial affect recognition and ToM (moderate to large effect size) followed by attributional style (small effect size) as well as negative and general symptoms (small to moderate effect size).[68] A systematic review of 32 studies assessing the effect of interventions which focused on at least one domain of SC found that significant improvement was noted in ToM and affect recognition domains. However, no improvement was noted in functional outcomes.[69] A systematic review of 61 studies assessing broad-based as well as targeted SC interventions reported that improvement in domains of emotion processing and ToM consistently with both the types of interventions.[70] Broad-based interventions include cognitive enhancement therapy, integrated psychological therapy, integrated neurocognitive therapy, social skills training, errorless learning, and cognitobehavioral social skills training. The broad-based interventions focus on the domains of perspective taking, appraisal of social context, reading of nonverbal cues, verbal communication, problem-solving, attributional style, emotional processing, assertiveness, and interpersonal relationship skills.[71]

The targeted interventions for each of the constructs of SC are summarized in [Table 3].
Table 3: Targeted interventions for Social cognition in Schizophrenia

Click here to view


Challenges exist in the development of culture-sensitive interventions for improving SC. For example, a recent pilot study demonstrating feasibility of Indian version of the Training of Affect Recognition program for patients of schizophrenia reported issues of culturally appropriate vernacular translation, changing situational cues in social context, and administration of the intervention to subjects who had limited computer literacy.[71]

Social cognition impairment as endophenotype in schizophrenia

There is increasing amount of research on SC as an endophenotype of schizophrenia. SC impairment has been postulated to be a potential trait marker. ToM has been found to be significantly impaired in first-degree relatives of patients with schizophrenia.[72] Domains of SC, such as emotional recognition, ToM, social perception, and attribution bias, have been found to be significantly impaired in patients of schizophrenia in remission compared to healthy controls. The impairment was found to be independent of neurocognitive deficits.[73] Impairment in SC was found to be persistent even during the phase of remission in patients with schizophrenia in two longitudinal studies, which adds credence to the trait marker hypothesis.[74],[75]

Social cognition in autism spectrum disorders

SC has been extensively studied in ASDs. ToM impairment is believed to be the primary deficit in SC in patients with ASD.[76] The seminal study by Baren Cohen et al. about false belief attribution was key in establishing ToM deficits in ASD.[77] The domains of social cue perception (face), emotional recognition, and ToM have been consistently found to be impaired in patients with ASD compared to general population.[78],[79],[80],[81],[82] Converging evidence from behavioral, neuroimaging, and electrophysiological studies add to the evidence of impairment of SC in ASD.[58],[80] SC deficits, especially of emotional recognition and ToM, are increasingly being recognized in patients with subthreshold forms of ASD known as broad autism phenotype.[83] A Cochrane review found that interventions targeting ToM had significant improvement in the ToM outcomes, but the evidence was concluded to be of low quality.[84] A systematic review of randomized controlled trials assessing interventions targeting emotional recognition reported significant improvement in emotional recognition domain scores postintervention. However, it was not associated with increase in social skills. Further, need of research to evaluate the utilization of targeting emotional recognition in clinical improvement was emphasized.[85]

Comparison of social cognition deficits between autism spectrum disorders and other psychiatric illness

Several studies have compared domains of SC in ASD with those in other psychiatric illness. Verbal ToM was significantly impaired in high-functioning ASD, compared to attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and typically developing children. Performance as well as applied ToM domains were significantly lower in high-functioning ASD, compared to ADHD and typically developing children.[86] ToM ability was found to be significantly impaired in patients with low- as well as high-functioning autism compared to patients with mental retardation/intellectual disability.[87] A meta-analysis of 37 studies found that the effect sizes for impairment in verbal and visual mentalization were significantly large for patients with schizophrenia as well as ASD. No significant difference was noted between verbal and visual mentalization among patients with ASD. However, a trend toward significance of greater deficits in verbal mentalization compared to visual mentalization was found in patients with schizophrenia.[88]

Social cognition in mood disorders

Akin to other neurocognitive deficits observed in manic episode, significant deficits have been reported for ToM domain in patients with bipolar disorder (BD).[89] Moreover, the deficits in the verbal domain of ToM were found even in the first-degree relatives of patients with BDs in comparison to the healthy controls.[90] As anticipated, compared to schizophrenia, significantly lower deficits in ToM domain of SC had been reported in patients with BD. However, the difference does not remain significant during the manic episode.[91] Further, a meta-analysis of 34 studies assessing ToM deficits in BD reported that the effect size was significantly higher in patients with BD in active episode (d = 1.23) as well as in euthymic state (d = 0.50). Similar findings have been observed during the episodes of depression too. Ladegaard et al. (2014) reported significant deficits in the higher-order SC domains (ToM, Social perception, and metacognition) in patients with first episode of depression in comparison to the healthy controls.[92] In a review of 31 published studies, Weightman et al. noted that interpretation of stimuli of SC was impaired in patients with depression in both active and euthymic states. Moreover, the degree of impairment was found to be inversely related to the severity of depression.[93]

Social cognition in borderline personality disorder

The results for deficits in SC have been conflicting from studies conducted in patients with borderline personality disorder (BPD).[94] Most of the studies have found patients with BPD to be “hypervigilant” and demonstrate “hypermentalization” due to better or similar performance on simpler tasks pertinent to social perception, ToM, and facial affect perception compared to healthy controls.[95],[96],[97],[98],[99],[100] However, some studies reported significantly lower scores in complex or advanced tasks assessing domains of ToM and facial affect perception.[101],[102],[103] Negativity bias has been noted with better recognition of negative emotions.[104] Furthermore, deficits in emotional recognition were particularly noted for positive and neutral emotions.[103],[105] In contrast, a recent Indian study reported they exhibited hypomentalizing, significantly lesser facial affect perception with no differences in 1st as well as 2nd order ToM and externalizing bias.[106]

Social cognition in alcohol use disorder

There are multiple meta-analyses which assessed emotional recognition and ToM deficits in alcohol use disorder (AUD). One of the meta-analyses reported moderate effect size for deficits in domain of emotional recognition while other found large effect size.[107],[108] Emotional recognition bias was noted in patients with AUD misidentifying facial emotions as angry, fear, and disgust, and a correlation was noted with consumption of alcohol over the last 3 months, but not mood.[109],[110] In addition, ToM deficits of large effect size were reported in two meta-analyses, and it has been shown that patients with AUD perform poorly on third-person ToM tasks compared to first-person ToM tasks.[107],[111],[112]


  Social Cognition in Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Top


Children with ADHD had significantly greater deficits in emotional recognition and ToM compared to healthy controls. However, children with ASD had significantly higher deficits in emotional recognition and ToM compared to children with ADHD. One interesting point to note is that adults with ADHD did not differ from healthy controls in the tasks on emotion recognition and ToM.[113]

Social cognition in eating disorders

Emotional processing but not ToM was significantly impaired in patients with anorexia nervosa (AN) compared to healthy controls.[114] Children at high risk of developing eating disorder had significantly greater risk for having SC impairment compared to those at low risk for developing eating disorders. It was interesting to note that children of mothers with binging/binging-purging type of eating disorder had significantly greater risk compared to those with mothers having nonbinging eating disorder.[115]

While some studies have found patients with AN having significantly lower scores in ToM tasks, others did not find any difference between patients and healthy controls.[116],[117],[118] Obese patients with binge eating disorder (BED) had significantly greater impairment in understanding their own emotions compared to non-BED and under-threshold BED patients. However, no significant difference was noted with regard to understanding of emotions of other persons.[119]

Social cognition in obsessive–compulsive disorder

Patients with obsessive–compulsive disorder were found to have no significant decrease in basic ToM tasks compared to healthy controls.[120],[121] However, they were found to have deficits in advanced ToM or second order tasks.[119]


  Conclusion Top


The search for literature for SC and psychiatry/mental disorders returned thousands of results. However, a concise article describing the basic concepts of SC, its dimensions, and application in psychiatry was not found. Hence, through this article, we attempted to provide an overview of concept of SC, various methods of its evaluation, and the clinical implication in psychiatric disorders.

The concept of SC has drastically evolved over the last century and the authors have described this construct from varying perspectives. Although certain leading groups of research like the MATRICS initiative of the NIMH have tried to refine the dimensions of SC, still a lot is yet to be understood. However, the domains, namely ToM, emotional perception, and social perception, have remained undoubted components of SC. Further, the existence of differing concepts of SC led to the development of various assessment tools. However, many of these did not withstand the changes in conceptualization of SC or were not amply investigated. The largest body of evidence of deficits in SC has been found in schizophrenia followed by ASDs, and fairly good amount of evidence supports the presence of social cognitive deficits in these disorders. Furthermore, a range of targeted interventions have been developed to address these deficiencies which affect the outcome of illness. Further, the literature is being made available regarding the SC deficits in other psychiatric disorders too. The refinements in neurobiological underpinnings may provide more insight into the role of SC in various psychiatric disorders. However, one may ponder over the clinical implications of evaluation of SC in mental illnesses as some studies did not find any association of improvement in SC with the functional outcome. Nevertheless, the field of SC and its application in psychiatry seems to be promising on the one hand, but the intricacies involved in the conceptualization as well as its evaluation have their limitations too. To exemplify, several earlier studies had methodological limitations such as smaller sample size, broad confidence intervals, lack of blinding, and inadequate description of measures to ensure fidelity of the intervention.[65],[68],[69] Many studies have studied only one domain of SC, but on the other hand, assessing and comparing several domains of SC rather than a unimodal approach could be of greater clinical relevance. In addition, the psychometric properties of various measures for SC still remain ill defined. Furthermore, the population norms for SC on the basis of various factors such as culture, gender, ethnicity, and age need to be researched. Furthermore, the standardization and validation of tests for assessing SC in different sociocultural groups is warranted for better understanding of SC. The tests for assessing SC developed in the Western world might not be suitable to the patients from the east which could lead to falsely lesser impairment on measures of SC.

All said and done, the field of SC may appear very intricate to a novice, but it holds on to a vast and promising arena of research. Given the evolving refinement of the concepts of SC, development of various assessment tools, the understanding of the neural systems, and creation of targeted pharmacological as well as nonpharmacological interventions, it is hoped that, in future, it will further benefit persons with mental illnesses.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Fiske ST, Taylor SE. Social Cognition: From Brains to Culture. 2nd ed. New York: Sage; 2013.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Reis HT, Patrick BC, Higgins ET, Kruglanski A. Social Psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles. 3rd ed. New York. Guilford; 2013. p. 118-121.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Fiske ST, Taylor SE. Social Cognition. 1st ed. New York: Mcgraw-Hill Book Company; 1991.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Baron RA, Branscombe NR. Social Psychology. 13th ed. London: Pearson Education; 2014. P. 418-21.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Green MF, Penn DL, Bentall R, Carpenter WT, Gaebel W, Gur RC, et al. Social cognition in schizophrenia: An NIMH workshop on definitions, assessment, and research opportunities. Schizophr Bull 2008;34:1211-20.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Brothers L. The neural basis of primate social communication. Motiv Emot 1990;1:81-91.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Pinkham AE. Social cognition in schizophrenia. J Clin Psychiatry 2014;75 Suppl 2:14-9.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Taylor SE. The interface of cognitive and social psychology. Cogn Soc Behav Environ 1981:189-211.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Combs DR, Adams SD, Penn DL, Roberts D, Tiegreen J, Stem P. Social cognition and interaction training (SCIT) for inpatients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders: Preliminary findings. Schizophr Res 2007;91:112-6.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Marder SR, Fenton W. Measurement and treatment research to improve cognition in schizophrenia: NIMH MATRICS initiative to support the development of agents for improving cognition in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res 2004;72:5-9.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Labbe T, Ciampi E, Carcamo Rodriguez C. Social cognition: Concepts, neural basis and its role in multiple sclerosis. Neurol Clinic Neurosci 2018;6:3-8.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5®). American Psychiatric Publication; 2013.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Pinkham AE, Penn DL, Green MF, Buck B, Healey K, Harvey PD. The social cognition psychometric evaluation study: Results of the expert survey and RAND panel. Schizophr Bull 2014;40:813-23.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Ekman P. Pictures of Facial Affect. Consulting Psychologists Press; 1976.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Young A, Perrett D, Calder A, Sprengelmeyer R, Ekman P. Facial Expressions of Emotion: Stimuli and Tests (FEEST). Bury St. Edmunds, UK: Thames Valley Test Company; 2002. p. 73.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Bowers D, Blonder LX, Heilman KM. The Florida Affect Battery Manual. Center for Neuropsychological Studies, Cognitive Neuroscience Laboratory. Gainesville: University of Florida; 1999.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
McDonald S, Flanagan S, Rollins J, Kinch J. TASIT: A new clinical tool for assessing social perception after traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2003;18:219-38.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
McDonald S, Bornhofen C, Shum D, Long E, Saunders C, Neulinger K, et al. Reliability and validity of the awareness of social inference test (TASIT): A clinical test of social perception. Disabil Rehabil 2006;28:1529-42.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Savage SA, Lillo P, Kumfor F, Kiernan MC, Piguet O, Hodges JR. Emotion processing deficits distinguish pure amyotrophic lateral sclerosis from frontotemporal dementia. Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener 2014;15:39-46.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Gur RC, Sara R, Hagendoorn M, Marom O, Hughett P, Macy L, et al. Amethod for obtaining 3-dimensional facial expressions and its standardization for use in neurocognitive studies. J Neurosci Methods 2002;115:137-43.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Carter CS, Barch DM, Gur R, Gur R, Pinkham A, Ochsner K. CNTRICS final task selection: Social cognitive and affective neuroscience-based measures. Schizophr Bull 2009;35:153-62.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Pinkham AE, Penn DL, Green MF, Harvey PD. Social cognition psychometric evaluation: Results of the initial psychometric study. Schizophr Bull 2016;42:494-504.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Chen KW, Lee SC, Chiang HY, Syu YC, Yu XX, Hsieh CL. Psychometric properties of three measures assessing advanced theory of mind: Evidence from people with schizophrenia. Psychiatry Res 2017;257:490-6.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Ludwig KA, Pinkham AE, Harvey PD, Kelsven S, Penn DL. Social cognition psychometric evaluation (SCOPE) in people with early psychosis: A preliminary study. Schizophr Res 2017;190:136-43.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Kim H, Somerville LH, Johnstone T, Polis S, Alexander AL, Shin LM, et al. Contextual modulation of amygdala responsivity to surprised faces. J Cogn Neurosci 2004;16:1730-45.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Bell M, Bryson G, Lysaker P. Positive and negative affect recognition in schizophrenia: A comparison with substance abuse and normal control subjects. Psychiatry Res 1997;73:73-82.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Davidson CA, Lesser R, Parente LT, Fiszdon JM. Psychometrics of social cognitive measures for psychosis treatment research. Schizophr Res 2018;193:51-7.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Baron-Cohen S, Wheelwright S, Hill J, Raste Y, Plumb I. The “Reading the mind in the eyes” test revised version: A study with normal adults, and adults with asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2001;42:241-51.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Vellante M, Baron-Cohen S, Melis M, Marrone M, Petretto DR, Masala C, et al. The “Reading the mind in the eyes” test: Systematic review of psychometric properties and a validation study in Italy. Cogn Neuropsychiatry 2013;18:326-54.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Peterson E, Miller SF. The eyes test as a measure of individual differences: How much of the variance reflects verbal IQ? Front Psychol 2012;3:220.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Adams RB Jr., Rule NO, Franklin RG Jr., Wang E, Stevenson MT, Yoshikawa S, et al. Cross-cultural reading the mind in the eyes: An fMRI investigation. J Cogn Neurosci 2010;22:97-108.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.
Gregory C, Lough S, Stone V, Erzinclioglu S, Martin L, Baron-Cohen S, et al. Theory of mind in patients with frontal variant frontotemporal dementia and alzheimer's disease: Theoretical and practical implications. Brain 2002;125:752-64.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.
Happé FG. An advanced test of theory of mind: Understanding of story characters' thoughts and feelings by able autistic, mentally handicapped, and normal children and adults. J Autism Dev Disord 1994;24:129-54.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.
Kaland N, Møller-Nielsen A, Smith L, Mortensen EL, Callesen K, Gottlieb D. The strange stories test – A replication study of children and adolescents with asperger syndrome. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2005;14:73-82.  Back to cited text no. 34
    
35.
Stone VE, Baron-Cohen S, Knight RT. Frontal lobe contributions to theory of mind. J Cogn Neurosci 1998;10:640-56.  Back to cited text no. 35
    
36.
Corcoran R, Mercer G, Frith CD. Schizophrenia, symptomatology and social inference: Investigating “theory of mind” in people with schizophrenia. Schizophr Res 1995;1:17:5-13.  Back to cited text no. 36
    
37.
Greig TC, Bryson GJ, Bell MD. Theory of mind performance in schizophrenia: Diagnostic, symptom, and neuropsychological correlates. J Nerv Ment Dis 2004;192:12-8.  Back to cited text no. 37
    
38.
Wexler BE, Zhu H, Bell MD, Nicholls SS, Fulbright RK, Gore JC, et al. Neuropsychological near normality and brain structure abnormality in schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry 2009;166:189-95.  Back to cited text no. 38
    
39.
Heider F, Simmel M. An experimental study of apparent behavior. Am J Psychol 1944;57:243-59.  Back to cited text no. 39
    
40.
Klin A, Jones W. Attributing social and physical meaning to ambiguous visual displays in individuals with higher-functioning autism spectrum disorders. Brain Cogn 2006;61:40-53.  Back to cited text no. 40
    
41.
Bell MD, Fiszdon JM, Greig TC, Wexler BE. Social attribution test – Multiple choice (SAT-MC) in schizophrenia: Comparison with community sample and relationship to neurocognitive, social cognitive and symptom measures. Schizophr Res 2010;122:164-71.  Back to cited text no. 41
    
42.
Johannesen JK, Lurie JB, Fiszdon JM, Bell MD. The social attribution task-multiple choice (SAT-MC): A psychometric and equivalence study of an alternate form. ISRN Psychiatry 2013;2013:830825.  Back to cited text no. 42
    
43.
Kerr SL, Neale JM. Emotion perception in schizophrenia: Specific deficit or further evidence of generalized poor performance? J Abnorm Psychol 1993;102:312-8.  Back to cited text no. 43
    
44.
Lo PM, Siu AM. Assessing social cognition of persons with schizophrenia in a Chinese population: A pilot study. Front Psychiatry 2017;8:302.  Back to cited text no. 44
    
45.
Costanzo M, Archer D. Interperting the expressive behavior of others: The interpersonal perception task. J Nonverbal Behav 1989;13:225-45.  Back to cited text no. 45
    
46.
Mayer JD, Salovey P, Caruso DR. Mayer-Salovey-Caruso emotional intelligence test (MSCEIT) users manual.  Back to cited text no. 46
    
47.
Rosenthal R. Sensitivity to Nonverbal Communication: The Pons Test. 1st ed. Baltimore; Johns Hopkins University Press; 1979. P. 421-25.  Back to cited text no. 47
    
48.
Corrigan PW, Green MF. Schizophrenic patients' sensitivity to social cues: The role of abstraction. Am J Psychiatry 1993;150:589-94.  Back to cited text no. 48
    
49.
Corrigan PW. Social cue perception and intelligence in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res 1994;13:73-9.  Back to cited text no. 49
    
50.
Corrigan PW, Buican B, Toomey R. Construct validity of two tests of social cognition in schizophrenia. Psychiatry Res 1996;63:77-82.  Back to cited text no. 50
    
51.
Bellack AS, Blanchard JJ, Mueser KT. Cue availability and affect perception in schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull 1996;22:535-44.  Back to cited text no. 51
    
52.
Bänziger T, Grandjean D, Scherer KR. Emotion recognition from expressions in face, voice, and body: The multimodal emotion recognition test (MERT). Emotion 2009;9:691-704.  Back to cited text no. 52
    
53.
Banziger T, Scherer KR, Hall JA, Rosenthal R. Introducing the mini PONS: A short multichannel version of the profile of nonverbal sensitivity (PONS). J Nonverbal Behav 2011;35:189-204.  Back to cited text no. 53
    
54.
Kinderman P, Bentall RP. Causal attributions in paranoia and depression: Internal, personal, and situational attributions for negative events. J Abnorm Psychol 1997;106:341-5.  Back to cited text no. 54
    
55.
Gao B, Wang Y, Zhu Y, Tian Q, Chen Z, Cohen Z, et al. Apsychometric investigation of the Chinese version of the internal, personal and situational attributions questionnaire (C-IPSAQ). Transl Psychiatry 2018;8:256.  Back to cited text no. 55
    
56.
Combs DR, Penn DL, Wicher M, Waldheter E. The ambiguous intentions hostility questionnaire (AIHQ): A new measure for evaluating hostile social-cognitive biases in paranoia. Cogn Neuropsychiatry 2007;12:128-43.  Back to cited text no. 56
    
57.
Combs DR, Penn DL, Michael CO, Basso MR, Wiedeman R, Siebenmorgan M, et al. Perceptions of hostility by persons with and without persecutory delusions. Cogn Neuropsychiatry 2009;14:30-52.  Back to cited text no. 57
    
58.
Black MH, Chen NT, Iyer KK, Lipp OV, Bölte S, Falkmer M, et al. Mechanisms of facial emotion recognition in autism spectrum disorders: Insights from eye tracking and electroencephalography. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2017;80:488-515.  Back to cited text no. 58
    
59.
Rosset E. It's no accident: Our bias for intentional explanations. Cognition 2008;108:771-80.  Back to cited text no. 59
    
60.
Roberts DL, Fiszdon J, Tek C. Ecological validity of the social cognition screening questionnaire (scsq). Schizophr Bull 2011;37:280.  Back to cited text no. 60
    
61.
Kanie A, Hagiya K, Ashida S, Pu S, Kaneko K, Mogami T, et al. New instrument for measuring multiple domains of social cognition: Construct validity of the social cognition screening questionnaire (Japanese version). Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2014;68:701-11.  Back to cited text no. 61
    
62.
Mehta UM, Thirthalli J, Naveen Kumar C, Mahadevaiah M, Rao K, Subbakrishna DK, et al. Validation of social cognition rating tools in Indian setting (SOCRATIS): A new test-battery to assess social cognition. Asian J Psychiatr 2011;4:203-9.  Back to cited text no. 62
    
63.
Cotter J, Granger K, Backx R, Hobbs M, Looi CY, Barnett JH. Social cognitive dysfunction as a clinical marker: A systematic review of meta-analyses across 30 clinical conditions. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2018;84:92-9.  Back to cited text no. 63
    
64.
Green MF, Horan WP, Lee J. Social cognition in schizophrenia. Nat Rev Neurosci 2015;16:620-31.  Back to cited text no. 64
    
65.
Fett AK, Viechtbauer W, Dominguez MD, Penn DL, van Os J, Krabbendam L, et al. The relationship between neurocognition and social cognition with functional outcomes in schizophrenia: A meta-analysis. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2011;35:573-88.  Back to cited text no. 65
    
66.
Kurtz MM, Gopal S, John S, Thara R. Cognition, social cognition and functional disability in early-stage schizophrenia: A study from Southern India. Psychiatry Res 2018;265:231-7.  Back to cited text no. 66
    
67.
Kurtz MM, Richardson CL. Social cognitive training for schizophrenia: A meta-analytic investigation of controlled research. Schizophr Bull 2012;38:1092-104.  Back to cited text no. 67
    
68.
Kurtz MM, Gagen E, Rocha NB, Machado S, Penn DL. Comprehensive treatments for social cognitive deficits in schizophrenia: A critical review and effect-size analysis of controlled studies. Clin Psychol Rev 2016;43:80-9.  Back to cited text no. 68
    
69.
Grant N, Lawrence M, Preti A, Wykes T, Cella M. Social cognition interventions for people with schizophrenia: A systematic review focussing on methodological quality and intervention modality. Clin Psychol Rev 2017;56:55-64.  Back to cited text no. 69
    
70.
Tan BL, Lee SA, Lee J. Social cognitive interventions for people with schizophrenia: A systematic review. Asian J Psychiatr 2018;35:115-31.  Back to cited text no. 70
    
71.
Thonse U, Behere RV, Frommann N, Sharma P. Social cognition intervention in schizophrenia: Description of the training of affect recognition program – Indian version. Asian J Psychiatr 2018;31:36-40.  Back to cited text no. 71
    
72.
Anselmetti S, Bechi M, Bosia M, Quarticelli C, Ermoli E, Smeraldi E, et al. 'Theory' of mind impairment in patients affected by schizophrenia and in their parents. Schizophr Res 2009;115:278-85.  Back to cited text no. 72
    
73.
Mehta UM, Thirthalli J, Naveen Kumar C, Keshav Kumar J, Keshavan MS, Gangadhar BN. Schizophrenia patients experience substantial social cognition deficits across multiple domains in remission. Asian J Psychiatr 2013;6:324-9.  Back to cited text no. 73
    
74.
Valaparla VL, Nehra R, Mehta UM, Thirthalli J, Grover S. Social cognition of patients with schizophrenia across the phases of illness – A longitudinal study. Schizophr Res 2017;190:150-9.  Back to cited text no. 74
    
75.
Gica S, Poyraz BC, Gulec H. Are emotion recognition deficits in patients with schizophrenia states or traits? A 6-month follow-up study. Indian J Psychiatry 2019;61:45-52.  Back to cited text no. 75
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
76.
Leekam S. Social cognitive impairment and autism: What are we trying to explain? Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2016;371:20150082.  Back to cited text no. 76
    
77.
Baron-Cohen S, Leslie AM, Frith U. Does the autistic child have a “theory of mind”? Cognition 1985;21:37-46.  Back to cited text no. 77
    
78.
Pelphrey K, Adolphs R, Morris JP. Neuroanatomical substrates of social cognition dysfunction in autism. Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev 2004;10:259-71.  Back to cited text no. 78
    
79.
Sasson NJ. The development of face processing in autism. J Autism Dev Disord 2006;36:381-94.  Back to cited text no. 79
    
80.
Harms MB, Martin A, Wallace GL. Facial emotion recognition in autism spectrum disorders: A review of behavioral and neuroimaging studies. Neuropsychol Rev 2010;20:290-322.  Back to cited text no. 80
    
81.
Sasson NJ, Pinkham AE, Carpenter KL, Belger A. The benefit of directly comparing autism and schizophrenia for revealing mechanisms of social cognitive impairment. J Neurodev Disord 2011;3:87-100.  Back to cited text no. 81
    
82.
Uljarevic M, Hamilton A. Recognition of emotions in autism: A formal meta-analysis. J Autism Dev Disord 2013;43:1517-26.  Back to cited text no. 82
    
83.
Sasson NJ, Nowlin RB, Pinkham AE. Social cognition, social skill, and the broad autism phenotype. Autism 2013;17:655-67.  Back to cited text no. 83
    
84.
Fletcher-Watson S, McConnell F, Manola E, McConachie H. Interventions based on the theory of mind cognitive model for autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014;3:CD008785.  Back to cited text no. 84
    
85.
Berggren S, Fletcher-Watson S, Milenkovic N, Marschik PB, Bölte S, Jonsson U. Emotion recognition training in autism spectrum disorder: A systematic review of challenges related to generalizability. Dev Neurorehabil 2018;21:141-54.  Back to cited text no. 85
    
86.
Miranda A, Berenguer C, Roselló B, Baixauli I, Colomer C. Social cognition in children with high-functioning autism spectrum disorder and attention-deficit/Hyperactivity disorder. Associations with executive functions. Front Psychol 2017;8:1035.  Back to cited text no. 86
    
87.
Yirmiya N, Erel O, Shaked M, Solomonica-Levi D. Meta-analyses comparing theory of mind abilities of individuals with autism, individuals with mental retardation, and normally developing individuals. Psychol Bull 1998;124:283-307.  Back to cited text no. 87
    
88.
Chung YS, Barch D, Strube M. A meta-analysis of mentalizing impairments in adults with schizophrenia and autism spectrum disorder. Schizophr Bull 2014;40:602-16.  Back to cited text no. 88
    
89.
Bora E, Bartholomeusz C, Pantelis C. Meta-analysis of theory of mind (ToM) impairment in bipolar disorder. Psychol Med 2016;46:253-64.  Back to cited text no. 89
    
90.
Reynolds MT, Van Rheenen TE, Rossell SL. Theory of mind in first degree relatives of individuals with bipolar disorder. Psychiatry Res 2014;219:400-2.  Back to cited text no. 90
    
91.
Mitchell RL, Young AH. Theory of mind in bipolar disorder, with comparison to the impairments observed in schizophrenia. Front Psychiatry 2015;6:188.  Back to cited text no. 91
    
92.
Ladegaard N, Larsen ER, Videbech P, Lysaker PH. Higher-order social cognition in first-episode major depression. Psychiatry Res 2014;216:37-43.  Back to cited text no. 92
    
93.
Weightman MJ, Air TM, Baune BT. A review of the role of social cognition in major depressive disorder. Front Psychiatry 2014;5:179.  Back to cited text no. 93
    
94.
Roepke S, Vater A, Preißler S, Heekeren HR, Dziobek I. Social cognition in borderline personality disorder. Front Neurosci 2012;6:195.  Back to cited text no. 94
    
95.
Domes G, Czieschnek D, Weidler F, Berger C, Fast K, Herpertz SC. Recognition of facial affect in borderline personality disorder. J Pers Disord 2008;22:135-47.  Back to cited text no. 95
    
96.
Fertuck EA, Jekal A, Song I, Wyman B, Morris MC, Wilson ST, et al. Enhanced 'reading the mind in the eyes' in borderline personality disorder compared to healthy controls. Psychol Med 2009;39:1979-88.  Back to cited text no. 96
    
97.
Lynch TR, Rosenthal MZ, Kosson DS, Cheavens JS, Lejuez CW, Blair RJ. Heightened sensitivity to facial expressions of emotion in borderline personality disorder. Emotion 2006;6:647-55.  Back to cited text no. 97
    
98.
Arntz A, Bernstein D, Oorschot M, Schobre P. Theory of mind in borderline and cluster-C personality disorder. J Nerv Ment Dis 2009;197:801-7.  Back to cited text no. 98
    
99.
Sharp C, Ha C, Carbone C, Kim S, Perry K, Williams L, et al. Hypermentalizing in adolescent inpatients: Treatment effects and association with borderline traits. J Pers Disord 2013;27:3-18.  Back to cited text no. 99
    
100.
Vaskinn A, Antonsen BT, Fretland RA, Dziobek I, Sundet K, Wilberg T. Theory of mind in women with borderline personality disorder or schizophrenia: Differences in overall ability and error patterns. Front Psychol 2015;6:1239.  Back to cited text no. 100
    
101.
Preißler S, Dziobek I, Ritter K, Heekeren HR, Roepke S. Social cognition in borderline personality disorder: Evidence for disturbed recognition of the emotions, thoughts, and intentions of others. Front Behav Neurosci 2010;4:182.  Back to cited text no. 101
    
102.
Sharp C, Pane H, Ha C, Venta A, Patel AB, Sturek J, et al. Theory of mind and emotion regulation difficulties in adolescents with borderline traits. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2011;50:563-730.  Back to cited text no. 102
    
103.
Fenske S, Lis S, Liebke L, Niedtfeld I, Kirsch P, Mier D. Emotion recognition in borderline personality disorder: Effects of emotional information on negative bias. Borderline Personal Disord Emot Dysregul 2015;2:10.  Back to cited text no. 103
    
104.
Domes G, Schulze L, Herpertz SC. Emotion recognition in borderline personality disorder-a review of the literature. J Pers Disord 2009;23:6-19.  Back to cited text no. 104
    
105.
Daros AR, Zakzanis KK, Ruocco AC. Facial emotion recognition in borderline personality disorder. Psychol Med 2013;43:1953-63.  Back to cited text no. 105
    
106.
Anupama V, Bhola P, Thirthalli J, Mehta UM. Pattern of social cognition deficits in individuals with borderline personality disorder. Asian J Psychiatr 2018;33:105-12.  Back to cited text no. 106
    
107.
Bora E, Zorlu N. Social cognition in alcohol use disorder: A meta-analysis. Addiction 2017;112:40-8.  Back to cited text no. 107
    
108.
Castellano F, Bartoli F, Crocamo C, Gamba G, Tremolada M, Santambrogio J, et al. Facial emotion recognition in alcohol and substance use disorders: A meta-analysis. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2015;59:147-54.  Back to cited text no. 108
    
109.
Freeman CR, Wiers CE, Sloan ME, Zehra A, Ramirez V, Wang GJ, et al. Emotion recognition biases in alcohol use disorder. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2018;42:1541-7.  Back to cited text no. 109
    
110.
Donadon MF, Osório FD. Current alcohol dependence and emotional facial expression recognition: A cross-sectional study. Arch Clin Psychol 2017;44:56-62.  Back to cited text no. 110
    
111.
Onuoha RC, Quintana DS, Lyvers M, Guastella AJ. A meta-analysis of theory of mind in alcohol use disorders. Alcohol Alcohol 2016;51:410-5.  Back to cited text no. 111
    
112.
Bosco FM, Capozzi F, Colle L, Marostica P, Tirassa M. Theory of mind deficit in subjects with alcohol use disorder: An analysis of mindreading processes. Alcohol Alcohol 2014;49:299-307.  Back to cited text no. 112
    
113.
Bora E, Pantelis C. Meta-analysis of social cognition in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD): Comparison with healthy controls and autistic spectrum disorder. Psychol Med 2016;46:699-716.  Back to cited text no. 113
    
114.
Adenzato M, Todisco P, Ardito RB. Social cognition in anorexia nervosa: Evidence of preserved theory of mind and impaired emotional functioning. PLoS One 2012;7:e44414.  Back to cited text no. 114
    
115.
Kothari R, Barona M, Treasure J, Micali N. Social cognition in children at familial high-risk of developing an eating disorder. Front Behav Neurosci 2015;9:208.  Back to cited text no. 115
    
116.
Hamatani S, Tomotake M, Takeda T, Kameoka N, Kawabata M, Kubo H, et al. Impaired social cognition in anorexia nervosa patients. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 2016;12:2527-31.  Back to cited text no. 116
    
117.
Harrison A, Sullivan S, Tchanturia K, Treasure J. Emotion recognition and regulation in anorexia nervosa. Clin Psychol Psychother 2009;16:348-56.  Back to cited text no. 117
    
118.
Tchanturia K, Happé F, Godley J, Treasure J, Bara-Carril N, Schmidt U. 'Theory of mind'in anorexia nervosa. Eur Eat Disord Rev 2004;12:361-6.  Back to cited text no. 118
    
119.
Aloi M, Rania M, Caroleo M, De Fazio P, Segura-García C. Social cognition and emotional functioning in patients with binge eating disorder. Eur Eat Disord Rev 2017;25:172-8.  Back to cited text no. 119
    
120.
Sayin A, Oral N, Utku C, Baysak E, Candansayar S. Theory of mind in obsessive-compulsive disorder: Comparison with healthy controls. Eur Psychiatry 2010;25:116-22.  Back to cited text no. 120
    
121.
Mavrogiorgou P, Bethge M, Luksnat S, Nalato F, Juckel G, Brüne M. Social cognition and metacognition in obsessive-compulsive disorder: An explorative pilot study. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2016;266:209-16.  Back to cited text no. 121
    



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Concept of Socia...
Evaluation of So...
Application Of S...
Social Cognition...
Conclusion
References
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed848    
    Printed81    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded143    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal


[TAG2]
[TAG3]
[TAG4]