|AWARD PAPER: DR GC BORAL AWARD PAPER
|Year : 2020 | Volume
| Issue : 1 | Page : 11-18
Relationship of stigma with burden and coping among caregivers of patients with severe mental disorders
Aseem Mehra, Ajay Kumar, Sandeep Grover, Subho Chakrabarti, Ajit Avasthi
Department of Psychiatry, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
|Date of Submission||10-Dec-2019|
|Date of Decision||25-Dec-2019|
|Date of Acceptance||04-Jan-2020|
|Date of Web Publication||17-Mar-2020|
Department of Psychiatry, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh - 160 012
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the association of stigma with the caregiver burden and coping. Methodology: One hundred and sixteen adult caregivers of persons with severe mental illness were evaluated on the Stigma Scale for Caregivers of People with Mental Illness (CPMI), Family Burden Interview (FBI) Schedule, and Family Coping Questionnaire. Results: In terms of stigma, the mean total score was highest for the affective component followed by behavioral and least for the cognitive component of CPMI. On FBI, the highest burden was reported for the financial burden followed by disruption of routine family activities, disruption of family leisure activities, disruption of family interaction, the effect on the physical health of others, and effect on the mental health of others. The most common coping strategy used by the caregivers was gathering information followed by positive communication and patient's social involvement. A higher level of stigma in all the domains was associated with a significantly higher burden in all the domains of the objective burden, except for effect on physical and mental health on others. Higher use of copings such as positive communication and social interests was associated with higher stigma in all the domains except for lack of significant association between positive communication and cognitive domain of stigma. Higher use of resignation as a coping mechanism was associated with a higher stigma in the cognitive domain of CPMI. Conclusion: This study shows that a higher level of stigma among caregivers of patients with severe mental disorder is associated with higher objective caregiver burden and higher use of coping mechanisms such as positive communication and social interest. Accordingly, it can be said that any effort to mitigate the caregiver burden needs to take stigma into account.
Keywords: Caregiver burden, coping, severe mental illness, stigma
|How to cite this article:|
Mehra A, Kumar A, Grover S, Chakrabarti S, Avasthi A. Relationship of stigma with burden and coping among caregivers of patients with severe mental disorders. Indian J Soc Psychiatry 2020;36:11-8
|How to cite this URL:|
Mehra A, Kumar A, Grover S, Chakrabarti S, Avasthi A. Relationship of stigma with burden and coping among caregivers of patients with severe mental disorders. Indian J Soc Psychiatry [serial online] 2020 [cited 2021 Dec 8];36:11-8. Available from: https://www.indjsp.org/text.asp?2020/36/1/11/280826
| Introduction|| |
Stigma is one of the important determinants of not seeking help among patients with mental disorders., In countries like India, where caregivers are intimately involved in the care of patients with mental disorders, in terms of supervising the medications and decision-making for the patients in terms of bringing him/her to the hospital, they also experience stigma.,,,,, In fact, when the caregivers are involved in all the treatment decision-making, caregiver stigma can be actually an important determinant of medication nonadherence, treatment nonadherence, and course and outcome of the illness. Accordingly, there is a need to understand the extent of caregiver stigma and its correlates.
Stigma experienced by the caregivers can be categorized as associative or courtesy and affiliate stigma., Associative stigma is understood as the stigmatization of family members because of their association with a patient of mental illness., In contrast, when the caregiver is affected by the prevailing public stigma, it is known as affiliate stigma. Affiliation of caregivers with the stigmatized individual often leads to negative consequences on the caregivers themselves in the form of unhappiness and helplessness. Affiliate stigma can also be understood as self-stigma, which has three interlocking features, that is, affect, behavior, and cognitive responses. Due to the affiliate stigma, the caregivers may conceal information about the mental illness of their closed ones, feel socially isolated, and leave the mentally ill patients alone.,, Resultantly, it can have negative consequences for a patient suffering from a mental illness.
The prevalence of stigma among the caregivers of patients with severe mental illnesses (SMIs) is reported to be high, with some of the studies reporting it to vary from 43% to 92%.,,,,,,, The previous data also show that a majority of the family members believe that most of the people in society devaluate people with mental illnesses and their families. Because of this, caregivers are reluctant to reveal their identity as a caregiver of a person with a mental illness.
The correlates of stigma among the caregivers of the patients with mental illness suggest that higher stigma among the caregivers is associated with patient's sociodemographic variables, clinical variables such as shorter duration of illness,,,, shorter duration of treatment, younger age of onset of illness in the patient,,,, caregiver being a parent, younger age at first hospitalization of the patient, shorter duration of being in the caregiver role, female (caregiver), and not on paid employment (caregiver). The previous studies also show that stigma among the caregivers is also associated with active or passive suicidal ideation, depressive disorder,, and higher psychological morbidity among the caregivers.,,,,,
Few studies have evaluated the relationship of stigma with caregiver burden, and these suggest that higher stigma is associated with higher caregiver burden.,,, Although studies from India have evaluated stigma among caregivers of SMIs,,,,,, these have not looked at the association of stigma and caregiver burden. Similarly, studies have not looked at the relationship between caregiver stigma and their coping mechanisms. In this background, this study aimed to assess the association of stigma, caregiver burden, and coping strategies among the caregivers of patients with SMI.
| Methodology|| |
This cross-sectional study was carried out at the psychiatry outpatient services of a multispecialty government-funded tertiary care teaching institute located in North India. The study sample comprised 116 persons suffering from SMI, i.e., schizophrenia, bipolar affective disorder, and recurrent depressive disorder were selected by purposive sampling. The other inclusion criteria for the study were age more than 18 years and are clinically stable, i.e., no change in the doses of psychotropic medications in 3 months before assessment. To be included in this study, caregivers were required to be 18 years or older, staying with and involved in the care of the patients for at least 1 year, and free from any diagnosed psychiatric illness.
The study was approved by the ethics committee of the institute, and all the participants were recruited after obtaining written informed consent.
The caregivers were assessed on:
- Stigma Scale for Caregivers of People with Mental Illness (CPMI): It is a 22-item scale, developed to measure caregivers' internalization of stigma. Each item is rated on a 4-point Likert scales from (1) strongly disagree to (4) strongly agree, with higher scores indicating a higher level of affiliate stigma. The various items of the scale measure the affiliate stigma in the three domains, i.e., cognitive (7 items), affective (7 items), and behavioral components (8 items). For making the three domains of stigma comparable, in this study, mean weighted scores were calculated for each component by dividing the mean total score for the domain by number of items included in the domain. The scale has excellent internal consistency with Cronbach's alpha of 0.95. The scale has been translated into Hindi and has been used in a previous study from India
- Family Burden Interview schedule: The Family Burden Interview (FBI), developed by Pai and Kapur, is a clinician-rated scale that has been commonly used to rate burden, particularly in Indian studies.,, Although the scale distinguishes between objective and subjective burden, the primary focus is on objective burden; the subjective burden is rated only on a single item. FBI comprises 24 items grouped under six areas of objective burden (financial burden, disruption of the routine of family activities, disruption of family leisure, disruption of family interaction, the effect on physical health of others, and effect on mental health of others) and one item evaluating the subjective burden. Furthermore, there is another open-ended question about any burden which family perceives, not covered by the items in the scale. Each item is rated on 0–2 scale. Higher scores indicate a higher level of caregiver burden. The score of <12 indicates a low burden and the score more than or equal to 12 is an indicator of high burden. The reliability and validity of the scale are more than 0.87 and 0.72, respectively. Psychometric properties of the scale have been shown to be satisfactory,
- Family Coping Questionnaire: It is a 23-item scale, each rated on 4 points with higher scores indicating higher use of coping. It has 7 subscales, i.e., information, acquisition, positive communication, social interest, coercion, avoidance, and resignation. Psychometric properties of the scale have been found to be good. The scale has been translated into Hindi and has been used in a previous study from India.
Statistical analysis was carried out using the Statistical Package for the Social Science Version 14 (SPSS for Windows, Version 14.0. Chicago, SPSS Inc., USA), version 14.0. Descriptive analysis was computed in terms of mean and standard deviation (SD) with range for continuous variables and frequency with percentage for ordinal and nominal variables. The relationship between the burden, coping strategies, and stigma with mental illness variables was investigated using the Pearson correlation coefficient. Comparisons were made using unpaired Student's t-test, Chi-square test, and Mann–Whitney U-test.
| Results|| |
The mean age of the patients was 43.2 (SD: 12.5) years, and the mean duration of formal education for the patients was 8.8 (SD: 4.4) years. Majority of the patients were married and not on any paid employment. Males outnumbered female patients. There was a nearly equal distribution of patients from nuclear and nonnuclear families and those from urban and rural localities. The majority (60.3%) of the participants were from middle socioeconomic status.
Among the patients, about two-third were suffering from schizophrenia and the rest were suffering from affective disorders. The mean duration of the illness at the time of assessment was 181.3 (SD: 115.6; range: 36–600) months. About one-fourth also had a comorbid physical illness (n = 30; 25.9%). A few patients had a family history of psychiatric illness (n = 22; 19.0%) [Table 1].
|Table 1: Sociodemographic and clinical profile of the patients and the caregivers|
Click here to view
The mean age of the caregivers was 45.1 (SD: 13.2) years, and the mean duration of education was 10.6 (SD: 4.1) years. Slightly more than half (51.7%) of the caregivers were males and were on paid employment (51.7%). Majority of the caregivers were married (88.8%). About one-third of the caregivers were spouses (37.1%) and about one-fourth (26.8%) were parents of the patients [Table 1].
Stigma, burden, and coping of caregivers of patients with SMI
The mean total score for CPMI scale was 63.6 (SD: 11.5). The mean weighted total score was highest for the affective component followed by behavioral and least for the cognitive component of CPMI [Table 2]. On FBI, the mean total objective score was 25.9 (SD: 7.3), and the mean subjective score was 1.1 (SD: 0.6). On different domains of FBI, the mean weighted score was highest for the financial burden followed by disruption of routine family activities, disruption of family leisure activities, disruption of family interaction, the effect on the physical health of others, and effect on mental health others [Table 2]. Concerning coping, the most common coping strategy used by the caregivers was gathering information followed by positive communication and patient's social involvement. Avoidance and coercion were the least commonly used coping strategies [Table 2].
When the stigma, burden, and coping of caregivers of patients with schizophrenia and affective disorders were compared, caregivers of patients with schizophrenia reported a higher level of stigma and burden in all the domains, except for lack of significant difference in the subjective burden. In terms of coping, compared to the caregivers of patients with affective disorders, caregivers of patients with schizophrenia more often used coping strategies of seeking information, avoidance, and resignation [Table 3].
Relationship of stigma with caregiver burden and coping
A higher level of stigma in all the domains was associated with the significantly higher total objective burden and all the domains of the objective burden, except for effect on physical and mental health on others. The higher burden in the form of the effect of physical health was associated with significantly higher stigma in all the domains except for the affective domain. The higher burden in the form of effect of mental health was associated only with higher stigma in the affective domain. There was no significant association between the subjective burden and stigma. In terms of coping, there were fewer significant correlations between coping and stigma. In terms of coping, higher use of copings such as positive communication and social interest was associated with higher stigma in all the domains except for lack of significant association with cognitive domain of stigma. Higher use of resignation as a coping mechanism was associated with a higher stigma in the cognitive domain of CPMI [Table 4].
When those with the low and high objective burden (i.e., total objective burden score of <12 or ≥12) were compared, those with higher objective burden reported higher stigma in all the domains [Table 5].
|Table 5: Comparison of stigma among patients with high and low objective burden (burden >12 means presence of burden)|
Click here to view
| Discussion|| |
The present study included 116 primary caregivers of patients with serious mental illness and assessed the relationship of stigma with caregiver burden and their coping mechanism.
The majority of the caregivers were middle-aged, educated, married, employed, and male. The majority of them were either parents or spouse. This caregiver profile is similar to that reported in earlier studies from India,,,,, suggesting that the caregivers included in the present study were representative of caregivers accompanying the patients with SMI to our clinic and other parts of the country.
The sociodemographic profile of the patients is also similar to that reported in many of the previous studies from our center,, other parts of India, and abroad.,,,
In the present study, the mean CPMI total weighted score was 2.89 (SD: 0.52), and in terms of various domains, the highest level of stigma was noted in the affective domain followed by behavioral and cognitive domains of CPMI. When we compare the findings of the present study with previous studies, which have used the same scale, it is evident that the mean weighted CPMI score was higher in the present study compared to some of the previous studies which reported mean weighted scores in the range of 2.1–2.42.,, When one evaluates the hierarchy of various domains, previous studies have also reported the highest level of stigma in the affective domain, as noted in the present study.,, However, in terms of other domains, previous studies suggest a higher level of stigma in the cognitive domain compared to the behavioral domain, whereas the present study suggests that stigma in the behavioral domain was slightly higher or equal to that in the cognitive domain.,, These subtle differences could be due to demographic and clinical variables of the patients and the demographic variables of the caregivers. Higher stigma in the affective domain suggests a higher level of feelings of inferiority, helplessness, and worry. These facts suggest that clinicians taking care of patients with SMI also need to evaluate the distress among the caregivers to reduce their experience of self-stigma.
In the present study, when the stigma reported by caregivers of patients with schizophrenia and affective disorders was compared, higher stigma was reported by the caregivers of patients with schizophrenia. Previous studies which have compared the caregivers of patients with schizophrenia and affective disorders have also reported similar findings.
The findings on the FBI in the present study are comparable to the previous studies,,, and reiterate the fact that caregivers of patients with SMI experience a high level of caregiver burden. The hierarchy of the caregiver burden in the various domains of objective burden is also supported by the existing literature.,,,,,,,
Previous studies from India have not used the Family Coping Questionnaire to assess the coping mechanisms of caregivers of patients with a SMI, and due to this, it is difficult to compare the findings of the present study with the existing literature. Although there is variation in the scale used, previous studies also suggest that caregivers often use copings such as consulting doctors, talking to friends/family members, and seeking practical help. The present study also suggests the use of seeking information, positive communication, patient social involvement, and social interest to be the commonly used coping strategies. In the present study too, avoidance was the least commonly used coping strategy as reported in some of the previous studies too.,
In terms of association of stigma and caregiver burden, the present study suggests that higher objective caregiver burden is associated with the higher perception of stigma, and this finding supports the existing literature from other parts of the globe.,,, We understand that our cross-sectional study is not powered to assess the causality, with respect to stigma, but this association suggests that an increase in one experience can increase the other. It would be interesting to evaluate the association of stigma and caregiver burden in longitudinal studies to understand which comes first. The association of these variables suggests that clinicians should evaluate both these variables among the caregivers of patients with SMI and address the same, to improve the caregiver outcomes. Surprising, the subjective burden did not appear to have any significant relationship with stigma. This lack of association suggests that it is not the subjective distress, but the objective interference with the caregiver life, which determines the perception of stigma. Accordingly, the psychoeducation of caregivers should focus on improving their skills to manage their own life in such a way that caregiving does not interfere much with their own and family functioning.
In terms of coping, the present study suggests that lower use of coping mechanisms such as positive communication and social interest was associated with the higher experience of stigma in all the domains. Higher use of resignation as a coping mechanism was associated with the perception of higher stigma in the cognitive domain. None of the other coping mechanisms emerged as significant correlates of stigma. Previous studies have not looked at the association of stigma and coping, and hence, it is difficult to compare the findings of the present study with the existing literature. Association of higher level of stigma with nonadaptive coping suggests that the clinicians should attempt to evaluate the coping of caregivers of patients with SMIs and should psychoeducation them to more often use adaptive coping, rather than maladaptive coping to reduce the perception of stigma.
The present study has certain limitations which include cross-sectional assessment, small sample size, and purposive sampling. The present study also did not focus on the assessment of other psychosocial variables such as social support and knowledge about the illness, which can also influence the perception of stigma. The present study was limited to the caregivers of patients, who were clinically stable and low level of psychopathology. Accordingly, the findings of the present study cannot be generalized to those with acute episode or high level of psychopathology. Previous studies must attempt to overcome these limitations, by including larger sample size and inclusion of patients in different stages of illness.
| Conclusion|| |
The present study suggests that a higher level of stigma among caregivers of SMI is associated with higher objective caregiver burden and lower use of coping mechanisms such as positive communication and social interest. Accordingly, efforts must be made to address stigma and caregiver burden among the caregivers of patients with SMI. Further, the caregivers must be encouraged to more often use adaptive coping mechanisms such as positive communication and social interest, to reduce the perception of stigma.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Sharma H, Sharma B, Sharma DB. Burden perceived stigma and coping style of caregivers of patients with schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. Int J Health Sci Res 2017;7:84-94.
Kohn R, Saxena S, Levav I, Saraceno B. The treatment gap in mental health care. Bull World Health Organ 2004;82:858-66.
Awad AG, Voruganti LN. The burden of schizophrenia on caregivers: A review. Pharmacoeconomics 2008;26:149-62.
Akbari M, Alavi M, Irajpour A, Maghsoudi J. Challenges of family caregivers of patients with mental disorders in Iran: A narrative review. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res 2018;23:329-37.
Grover S, Pradyumna, Chakrabarti S. Coping among the caregivers of patients with schizophrenia. Ind Psychiatry J 2015;24:5-11.
] [Full text]
Chan SW. Global perspective of burden of family caregivers for persons with schizophrenia. Arch Psychiatr Nurs 2011;25:339-49.
Lau DY, Pang AH. Caregiving experience for Chinese caregivers of persons suffering from severe mental disorders. Hong Kong J Psychiatry 2007;17:75-80.
von Kardorff E, Soltaninejad A, Kamali M, Eslami Shahrbabaki M. Family caregiver burden in mental illnesses: The case of affective disorders and schizophrenia: A qualitative exploratory study. Nord J Psychiatry 2016;70:248-54.
Goffman E. In: Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. New York: Simon and Schuster; 1963.
Mehta SI, Farina A. Associative stigma: Perceptions of the difficulties of college-aged children of stigmatized fathers. J Soc Clin Psychol 1988;7:192-202.
Mak WW, Cheung RY. Affiliate stigma among caregivers of people with intellectual disability or mental illness. J Appl Res Intellect Disabil 2008;21:532-45.
Helgason L. Twenty years' follow-up of first psychiatric presentation for Schizophrenia: What could have been prevented?. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1990;81:231-5.
Loebel AD, Lieberman JA, Alvir JM, Mayerhoff DI, Geisler SH, Szymanski SR. Duration of psychosis and outcome in first-episode schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry 1992;149:1183-8.
Phelan JC, Bromet EJ, Link BG. Psychiatric illness and family stigma. Schizophr Bull 1998;24:115-26.
Thara R, Srinivasan TN. How stigmatising is schizophrenia in India? Int J Soc Psychiatry 2000;46:135-41.
Struening EL, Perlick DA, Link BG, Hellman F, Herman D, Sirey JA. Stigma as a barrier to recovery: The extent to which caregivers believe most people devalue consumers and their families. Psychiatr Serv 2001;52:1633-8.
Phillips MR, Pearson V, Li F, Xu M, Yang L. Stigma and expressed emotion: A study of people with schizophrenia and their family members in China. Br J Psychiatry 2002;181:488-93.
van Brakel WH, Anderson AM, Mutatkar RK, Bakirtzief Z, Nicholls PG, Raju MS, et al
. The Participation Scale: Measuring a key concept in public health. Disabil Rehabil 2006;28:193-203.
Angermeyer MC, Schulze B, Dietrich S. Courtesy stigma—a focus group study of relatives of schizophrenia patients. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2003;38:593-602.
Grover S, Hazari N, Aneja J, Chakrabarti S, Avasthi A. Stigma and its correlates among patients with bipolar disorder: A study from a tertiary care hospital of North India. Psychiatry Res 2016;244:109-16.
Grover S, Aneja J, Hazari N, Chakrabarti S, Avasthi A. Stigma and its correlates among caregivers of patients with bipolar disorder. Indian J Psychol Med 2019;41:455-61.
] [Full text]
Grover S, Avasthi A, Singh A, Dan A, Neogi R, Kaur D, et al
. Stigma experienced by patients with severe mental disorders: A nationwide multicentric study from India. Psychiatry Res 2017;257:550-8.
Switaj P, Wciórka J, Smolarska-Switaj J, Grygiel P. Extent and predictors of stigma experienced by patients with schizophrenia. Eur Psychiatry 2009;24:513-20.
Staring AB, Van der Gaag M, Van den Berge M, Duivenvoorden HJ, Mulder CL. Stigma moderates the associations of insight with depressed mood, low self-esteem, and low quality of life in patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders. Schizophr Res 2009;115:363-9.
Singh A, Mattoo SK, Grover S. Stigma and its correlates in patients with schizophrenia attending a general hospital psychiatric unit. Indian J Psychiatry 2016;58:291-300.
] [Full text]
Ostman M, Kjellin L. Stigma by association: Psychological factors in relatives of people with mental illness. Br J Psychiatry 2002;181:494-8.
El-AM EE, Raya YM, Zaki AS. Depressive disorders among caregivers of schizophrenic patients in relation to burden of care and perceived stigma. Curr Psychiatry 2010;17:15-25.
Magaña SM, Ramírez García JI, Hernández MG, Cortez R. Psychological distress among latino family caregivers of adults with schizophrenia: The roles of burden and stigma. Psychiatr Serv 2007;58:378-84.
Basher S, Niazi RS, Minhas FA, Ali W, Najam N. Depression and Anxiety in the caregivers of mentally ill patients. J Pak Psychiatr Soc 2005;2:27-33.
Koukia E, Madianos MG. Is psychosocial rehabilitation of schizophrenic patients preventing family burden? A comparative study. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs 2005;12:415-22.
Wittmund B, Wilms HU, Mory C, Angermeyer MC. Depressive disorders in spouses of mentally ill patients. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2002;37:177-82.
Werner P, Mittelman MS, Goldstein D, Heinik J. Famil stigma and caregiver burden in Alzheimer disease. Gerontologist 2012;52:89-97.
Kate N, Grover S, Kulhara P, Nehra R. Relationship of caregiver burden with coping strategies, social support, psychological morbidity, and quality of life in the caregivers of schizophrenia. Asian J Psychiatr 2013;6:380-8.
Pai S, Kapur RL. The burden on the family of a psychiatric patient: Development of an interview schedule. Br J Psychiatry 1981;138:332-5.
Chakrabarti S, Raj L, Kulhara P, Avasthi A, Verma SK. Comparison of the extent and pattern of family burden in affective disorders and schizophrenia. Indian J Psychiatry 1995;37:105-12.
] [Full text]
Chakrabarti S, Gill S. Coping and its correlate among caregivers of patients with bipolar disorder: A preliminary study. Bipolar Disord 2002;4:50-60.
Raj L, Kulhara P, Avasthi A. Social burden of positive and negative schizophrenia. Int J Soc Psychiatry 1991;37:242-50.
Chien WT, Norman I. The validity and reliability of a Chinese version of the family burden interview schedule. Nurs Res 2004;53:314-22.
Martorell A, Pereda A, Salvador-Carulla L, Ochoa S, Ayuso-Mateos JL. Validation of the Subjective and Objective Family Burden Interview (SOFBI/ECFOS) in primary caregivers to adults with intellectual disabilities living in the community. J Intellect Disabil Res 2007;51:892-901.
Magliano L, Guarneri M, Marasco C, Tosini P, Morosini P, Maj M. A new questionnaire assessment coping strategies in relatives of patients with schizophrenia development and factor analysis. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1996;94:224-8.
Aggarwal M, Avasthi A, Kumar S, Grover S. Experience of caregiving in schizophrenia: A study from India. Int J Soc Psychiatry 2011;57:224-36.
Chandrasekaran R, Sivaprakash B, Jayestri SR. Coping strategies of the relatives of schizophrenic patients. Indian J Psychiatry 2002;44:9-13.
] [Full text]
Gopinath PS, Chaturvedi SK. Distressing behaviour of schizophrenics at home. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1992;86:185-8.
Nehra R, Chakrabarti S, Kulhara P, Sharma R. Caregivercoping in bipolar disorder and schizophrenia–A re-examination. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2005;40:329-36.
Grover S, Avasthi A, Chakrabarti S, Bhansali A, Kulhara P. Cost of care of schizophrenia: a study of Indian out-patient attenders. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2005;112:54-63.
Dyck DG, Short R, Vitaliano PP. Predictors of burden and infectious illness in schizophrenia caregivers. Psychosom Med 1999;61:411-9.
Kate N, Grover S, Kulhara P, Nehra R. Relationship of quality of life with coping and burden in primary caregivers of patients with schizophrenia. Int J Soc Psychiatry 2014;60:107-16.
Gupta A, Solanki RK, Koolwal GD, Gehlot S. Psychological well-being and burden in caregivers of patients with schizophrenia. Int J Med Sci Public Health 2015;4:70-6.
Grover S, Chakrabarti S, Ghormode D, Dutt A, Kate N, Kulhara P. Clinicians' versus caregivers' ratings of burden in patients with schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. Int J Soc Psychiatry 2014;60:330-6.
Yu Y, Liu ZW, Tang BW, Zhao M, Liu XG, Xiao SY. Reported family burden of schizophrenia patients in rural China. PLoS One 2017;12:e0179425.
Barrowclough C, Parle M. Appraisal, psychological adjustment and expressed emotion in relatives of patients suffering from schizophrenia. Br J Psychiatry 1997;171:26-30.
Joyce J, Leese M, Szmukler G. The experience of caregiving inventory: Further evidence. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2000;35:185-9.
Magliano L, Fadden G, Madianos M, de Almeida JM, Held T, Guarneri M, et al
. Burden on the families of patients with schizophrenia: Results of the BIOMED I study. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 1998;33:405-12.
Roick C, Heider D, Toumi M, Angermeyer MC. The impact of caregivers' characteristics, patients' conditions and regional differences on family burden in schizophrenia: A longitudinal analysis. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2006;114:363-74.
Creado DA, Parkar SR, Kamath RM. A comparison of the level of functioning in chronic schizophrenia with coping and burden in caregivers. Indian J Psychiatry 2006;48:27-33.
] [Full text]
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5]
|This article has been cited by|
||WeChat use among family caregivers of people living with schizophrenia and its relationship to caregiving experiences
| ||Di-fan Zang,Xian-tao Zhang,Yi-lu Li,Tong-xin Li,Shui-yuan Xiao,Jacob Kraemer Tebes,Yu Yu |
| ||Computers in Human Behavior. 2021; : 106877 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||The experiences of family caregivers of people with severe mental illness in the Middle East: A systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative data
| ||Aisha Hamed Alyafei,Taghrid Alqunaibet,Hassan Mansour,Afia Ali,Jo Billings,Perla Werner |
| ||PLOS ONE. 2021; 16(7): e0254351 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|