|Year : 2020 | Volume
| Issue : 1 | Page : 60-63
Depression, anxiety, and stress among Indian urban affluent adults
Shraddha Chauhan, Bani Tamber Aeri
Department of Food and Nutrition, Institute of Home Economics, New Delhi, India
|Date of Submission||23-Dec-2018|
|Date of Decision||09-Apr-2019|
|Date of Acceptance||30-Oct-2019|
|Date of Web Publication||17-Mar-2020|
Bani Tamber Aeri
Department of Food and Nutrition, Institute of Home Economics, F-4, Hauz Khas Enclave, New Delhi - 110 016
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
Introduction: Mental health disorders now have a major share in the global burden of diseases. Regular screening of populations is crucial for timely detection and prevention. A lot of attention has been rendered to the assessment of depression, anxiety, and stress using Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale-21 (DASS-21) among school- or college-going population. However, assessments among adults are limited. Methodology: Urban, affluent, 30–45-year-old apparently healthy adults (n = 218; both males and females) were enrolled from preventive health check programs of private hospitals in the National Capital Region, Delhi, India. The DASS-21 item questionnaire was administered as a part of cross-sectional data collection after obtaining written informed consent. Scores were computed as per the DASS-21 manual, and their correlations with probable demographic, dietary, lifestyle, anthropometric, and biophysical factors were explored. Results: Mild to moderate levels of depression anxiety and stress were observed among 22.1%, 23% and 15.2% respectively and severe or extremely severe levels were observed among 5.1%, 8.7% and 7.3% participants respectively. No meaningful correlations were observed with demographic, dietary, lifestyle, anthropometric, and biophysical factors in this population. Conclusion: The incidence of these factors in an apparently healthy and productive population highlights the importance of regular screening for timely detection and designing clinical preventive strategies. Also, further research is needed to ascertain if the DASS scores have any probable relationship with demographic dietary, lifestyle, anthropometric and biophysical factors such as those assessed in this study.
Keywords: Adults, Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale, Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale-21, India*, stress, urban
|How to cite this article:|
Chauhan S, Aeri BT. Depression, anxiety, and stress among Indian urban affluent adults. Indian J Soc Psychiatry 2020;36:60-3
| Introduction|| |
Stress has increasingly become a common part of the urban lifestyle and has been found to be persistently prevalent among young adults., Long-term exposure to stress can have adverse effects on the musculoskeletal health, cardiovascular system, and gastrointestinal system among other health issues, whereas short-term stress can act as a trigger for fatal health events.,,, In fact, chronic stress may cause depression and anxiety among individuals. Therefore, assessment of these factors is essential for preventive action.
There are several standardized psychological assessment tools available to assess depression – Patient Health Questionnaire, stress – the Perceived Stress Scale and the Standard Stress Scale, and anxiety – Generalized Anxiety Disorder questionnaire, among populations. The 21-item depression anxiety and stress scale (DASS-21) is a comprehensive tool with three seven-item subscales assessing each of these factors. Several studies have used DASS-21 for the assessment of school- or college-going students in India.,,,,, However, studies on assessment among young adults have been limited. Hence, in this study, DASS-21 was used to assess depression, anxiety, and stress among 30–45-year-old young Indian adults.
| Methodology|| |
Apparently healthy urban affluent 30–45-year-old adults (both males and females) were enrolled from preventive health check programs of private hospitals in National Capital Region, Delhi, India. The DASS-21 questionnaire was administered to the participants as a part of cross-sectional data collection after obtaining their written informed consent. For administration, they were instructed to rank the statements from 0 to 3 indicating the extent to which each of the statements applied to the past week of their life (least applicable was scored 0, whereas most applicable was scored 3). The scores were calculated separately for depression, anxiety, and stress using a standard scoring template available with the DASS-21 package. Final scores were obtained by multiplying each score by 2. These scores were then compared with the standard DASS-21 severity ratings, as indicated in [Table 1].
|Table 1: DASS-21 severity ratings for depression, anxiety and stress scores|
Click here to view
As a part of the cross-sectional data, information pertaining to the demographic (age, gender, education, and socioeconomic status), dietary (food habit, meal pattern, meal skipping, snacking, and eating out), lifestyle (smoking, alcohol consumption, exercise, occupation, nature of work, and commutation), anthropometric (body mass index, weight, and waist circumference), and biophysical (lipid profile and blood pressure) factors was collected. Kendall's tau (for continuous variables) and point biserial (for categorical variables) correlation were used to explore the correlation between these factors and the DASS scores of participants. STATA 13 software (StataCorp, Texas, USA) was used for this purpose.
| Results|| |
The median depression, anxiety, and stress score of the participants corresponded to the normal category as per the DASS severity ratings. The overall DASS scores indicated that the majority of the participants were experiencing normal levels of depression (72.9%), anxiety (68.4%), and stress (77.5%), i.e., levels that are not high enough to be of clinical significance (P. Lovibond, personal communication, August 8, 2015). In other words, the extent of depression, anxiety, and stress that these individuals were experiencing is a usual part of day-to-day life and is not detrimental for their health as it can usually be coped well with. However, there were still 22.1%, 23%, and 15.2% of participants who were experiencing mild-to-moderate levels of depression, anxiety, and stress, respectively. In fact, 5.1%, 8.7%, and 7.3% of them were experiencing severe or extremely severe depression, anxiety, and stress levels, respectively. Gender-wise observations revealed that severe or extremely severe depression and anxiety levels were more common among males, whereas females were more commonly experiencing severe or extremely severe stress in their daily lives [Table 2].
On testing the probable correlations between the demographic, dietary, lifestyle, anthropometric and biophysical factors, and the DASS scores of the participants, no meaningful correlations were observed. They were mostly found to be weak-negative or weak-positive correlation (coefficients nearing zero).
| Discussion|| |
Younger population going to school and college has been the subject of interest for studying mental health issues in India. Not many studies have assessed these psychological factors among young Indian adults. To the best of our knowledge, our study is the first to use DASS-21 among adults of age 30–45 years. The scores indicate that on an average, nearly one-fourth of the adults had higher than normal levels of depression, anxiety, and stress, i.e., levels high enough to be of clinical significance. In fact, about 5%–8% of them were experiencing severe or extremely severe levels. This observation is critical because these adults were apparently healthy and were carrying out their normal routine life wherein their mental health issues would probably remain undetected. Among the few studies that have assessed adults, the prevalence of work stress among women has been reported to be 64%. In fact, higher levels of stress have also been seen among homemakers. More recently, similar prevalence was observed among resident Indian doctors; with almost 18.6%, 20.8%, and 19.1% of them experiencing mildtomoderate levels and 9.1%, 15.8%, and 5.2% of them experiencing severe and extremely severe levels of depression, anxiety, and stress, respectively.
We did not find any meaningful correlations between probable demographic, diet, lifestyle, anthropometric and biophysical factors, and the DASS scores obtained by the participants. Literature indicates that not many studies have tested and reported such correlations. There is probably just one study that found significant associations between work-related factors such as job position, long duty hours, lack of job satisfaction, staying in a hostel, etc., and the DASS scores in the Indian adult population.
Mental health issues can have a detrimental effect on health-related behaviors (e.g., alcohol consumption and tobacco smoking or dependence, poor diet, and reduced physical exercise) that can increase the risk of several major morbidities such as cardiovascular diseases, cancers, etc.,,,, Even then, they are the leading cause of years lived with disability worldwide along with substance abuse disorders, with depressive disorders accounting for 40·5%, and anxiety disorders accounting for 14·6% of disability-adjusted life years caused. These statistics clearly indicate the importance and the lack of early detection as well as prevention of mental health issues among populations. In fact, it can be rightly said that they have not been given the attention they warrant as mental health issues have still been left out of the purview of global action plans for the prevention of major noncommunicable diseases.
| Conclusion|| |
With this evidence in the background, our study highlights the importance of preventive screening for mental health and designing clinical preventive strategies for timely detection among the young population. Furthermore, it stresses on the need for further research studies to determine probable factors that might be correlated with the DASS scores for strengthening the preventive strategies for mental health that may be designed based on the application of this tool.
The authors acknowledge the financial assistance provided by the University Grants Commission, Government of India, under the Junior/Senior Research Fellow Scheme awarded to Dr. Shraddha Chauhan.
Financial support and sponsorship
The first author was awarded a University Grants Commission's Research Fellowship for this research work taken up as a part of her PhD.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Sarkar S, Gupta R, Menon V. A systematic review of depression, anxiety and stress among medical students in India. J Mental Health Hum Behav 2017;22:88-96. [Full text]
Sahoo S, Khess CR. Prevalence of depression, anxiety, and stress among young male adults in India: A dimensional and categorical diagnoses-based study. J Nerv Ment Dis 2010;198:901-4.
Hauke A, Flintrop J, Brun E, Rugulies R. The impact of work-related psychosocial stressors on the onset of musculoskeletal disorders in specific body regions: A review and meta-analysis of 54 longitudinal studies. Work Stress 2011;25:243-56.
Steptoe A, Kivimäki M. Stress and cardiovascular disease. Nat Rev Cardiol 2012;9:360-70.
Khan S, Khan RA. Chronic stress leads to anxiety and depression. Ann Psychiatry Ment Health 2017;5:1091.
Sajadinejad MS, Asgari K, Molavi H, Kalantari M, Adibi P. Psychological issues in inflammatory bowel disease: An overview. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2012;2012:106502.
Phillips AC, Carroll D, Der G. Negative life events and symptoms of depression and anxiety: Stress causation and/or stress generation. Anxiety Stress Coping 2015;28:357-71.
Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The PHQ-9: Validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med 2001;16:606-13.
Cohen S, Kamarck T, Mermelstein R. A global measure of perceived stress. J Health Soc Behav 1983;24:385-96.
Gross C, Seeba K. The Standard Stress Scale (SSS): Measuring Stress in the Life Course. NEPS Working Paper No. 452014.
Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JB, Löwe B. A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: The GAD-7. Arch Intern Med 2006;166:1092-7.
Lovibond SH, Lovibond PF. Manual for the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales. 2nd
ed. Sydney: Psychology Foundation; 1995.
Kumar KS, Akoijam BS. Depression, anxiety and stress among higher secondary school students of Imphal, Manipur. Indian J Community Med 2017;42:94-6.
] [Full text]
Bisla P, Singh K, Kumar R. Study of depression, anxiety and stress among school going adolescents. Indian J Psy Socl Work 2017;8:6-9.
Singh K, Junnarkar M, Sharma S. Anxiety, stress, depression, and psychosocial functioning of Indian adolescents. Indian J Psychiatry 2015;57:367-74.
] [Full text]
Bhasin SK, Sharma R, Saini NK. Depression, anxiety and stress among adolescent students belonging to affluent families: A school-based study. Indian J Pediatr 2010;77:161-5.
Ghaderi AR, Venkatesh KG, Kumar S. Depression, anxiety and stress among the Indian and Iranian students. J Indian Acad Appl Psychol 2009;35:33-7.
Parashar M, Singh M, Kishore J, Pathak R, Panda M. Prevalence and correlates of stress among working women of a tertiary health centre in Delhi, India. Indian J Med Spec 2017;8:77-81.
Patel PA, Patel PP, Khadilkar AV, Chiplonkar SA, Patel AD. Impact of occupation on stress and anxiety among Indian women. Women Health 2017;57:392-401.
Dave S, Parikh M, Vankar G, Valipay SK. Depression, anxiety, and stress among resident doctors of a teaching hospital. Indian J Soc Psychiatry 2018;34:163-71. [Full text]
Bradley SM, Rumsfeld JS. Depression and cardiovascular disease. Trends Cardiovasc Med 2015;25:614-22.
Huerta-Franco MR, Vargas-Luna M, Tienda P, Delgadillo-Holtfort I, Balleza-Ordaz M, Flores-Hernandez C, et al.
Effects of occupational stress on the gastrointestinal tract. World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol 2013;4:108-18.
Johansson L, Guo X, Waern M, Ostling S, Gustafson D, Bengtsson C, et al.
Midlife psychological stress and risk of dementia: A 35-year longitudinal population study. Brain 2010;133:2217-24.
Chida Y, Steptoe A. Greater cardiovascular responses to laboratory mental stress are associated with poor subsequent cardiovascular risk status: A meta-analysis of prospective evidence. Hypertension 2010;55:1026-32.
Pryor L, Da Silva MA, Melchior M. Mental health and global strategies to reduce NCDs and premature mortality. Lancet Public Health 2017;2:e350-e351.
Whiteford HA, Degenhardt L, Rehm J, Baxter AJ, Ferrari AJ, Erskine HE, et al
. Global burden of disease attributable to mental and substance use disorders: Finding from the global burden of disease study 2010. Lancet 2013;382:1575-86.
Ngo VK, Rubinstein A, Ganju V, Kanellis P, Loza N, Rabadan-Diehl C, et al.
Grand challenges: Integrating mental health care into the non-communicable disease agenda. PLoS Med 2013;10:e1001443.
[Table 1], [Table 2]