|Year : 2020 | Volume
| Issue : 5 | Page : 87-88
Patients with preexisting mental illness and other vulnerable groups in the COVID-19 pandemic
Rakesh Kumar Chadda
Department of Psychiatry, National Drug Dependence Treatment Centre, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
|Date of Submission||26-Jul-2020|
|Date of Acceptance||27-Jul-2020|
|Date of Web Publication||02-Oct-2020|
Prof. Rakesh Kumar Chadda
Department of Psychiatry, National Drug Dependence Treatment Centre, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi - 110 029
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
|How to cite this article:|
Chadda RK. Patients with preexisting mental illness and other vulnerable groups in the COVID-19 pandemic. Indian J Soc Psychiatry 2020;36, Suppl S1:87-8
|How to cite this URL:|
Chadda RK. Patients with preexisting mental illness and other vulnerable groups in the COVID-19 pandemic. Indian J Soc Psychiatry [serial online] 2020 [cited 2020 Oct 26];36, Suppl S1:87-8. Available from: https://www.indjsp.org/text.asp?2020/36/5/87/297141
In the last few months, the whole world has been taken aback by the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, which has probably played more havoc than even the two world wars by affecting most of the countries across almost all continents of the world. Because of its rapid spread across the world, the huge population it has affected, its highly infectious nature, and widespread transmission of the illness despite not a very high fatality rate, COVID-19 has brought a panic-like reaction in the whole world community. The pandemic has been associated with psychosocial reactions and symptoms of stress, anxiety and depression in those detected positive as well as in their contacts and also the health-care workers. Due to the countrywide lockdowns in many countries as well as the diversion of health services from non-COVID to exclusive COVID care facilities, the pandemic has adversely affected the non-COVID health care. This has impacted the already-vulnerable population with preexisting mental illness or severe physical illnesses, whose continuation of care has been affected.
The review by Khandelwal in this issue of the journal, very succinctly discusses the psychosocial impact of the pandemic tracing its progress across the world, the initiatives taken up by the Government of India including the countrywide lockdown continuing for >10 weeks, diversion of the general health services to COVID-specific health services, creation of investigation facilities across the country, massive unemployment resulting from the closure of industries and businesses because of the lockdown, and the effects of the reverse migration. The lockdown with most of the population confined to closed doors in their respective houses because of the fear of getting the deadly infection; economic breakdown; and closure of all educational institutions and the entertainment industry as well as various avenues of the outdoor activities including parks, business malls, and markets, along with continuous streaming of news about the increasing number of cases and fatalities related to COVID-19, have all added to the stress reactions in the general population.
Stated as the fastest-moving global public health crisis in a century, COVID-19 has brought the health systems across the world including those of the most advanced economies to a halt by its rapid and massive spread. India, fortunately, by clamping a countrywide lockdown, was able to slow down the progress of the infection, though the growth graph of the infection as well as the fatalities has been rising even after 10 weeks of the lockdown, which is now being lifted in a gradual manner.
In the face of the pandemic leading to its devastating effects on the economic infrastructure, unemployment, community fear and panic, and psychosocial effects of lockdown and quarantine, persons with preexisting mental health problems and the other vulnerable population need specific attention from the state and the society as also stated in the article.
Declaration of the national-level lockdown in India was meant for controlling the spread of infection, but its sudden declaration came out with many adverse consequences. Closure of industrial sector and business establishments led to a large population, working in such places, out of job and economic crisis. This group constituted a large section of population in big cities such as New Delhi, Mumbai, and others. Many of them in the absence of the availability of local transport left their houses and started moving toward their native places, leaving their abodes in the cities where they had lived for decades. Unfortunately, the state and the community were not able to make adequate arrangements or coordinate the needed support for this population in the cities.
The period of lockdown though helped the state health sector to organize its services for the COVID-19 pandemic, affected adversely the persons suffering from other illnesses including those with severe mental illnesses on treatment and those with serious physical illnesses such as cancer, cardiac, or illnesses of related nature. Persons with mental illnesses on treatment and those with substance use disorders on substitution treatment and with other illnesses including the life-threatening ones were not able to access the services, leading to multiple adverse consequences. The situation has not even been a healthy one in the advanced economies and countries such as the USA or most from Europe.
The National Disaster Management Authority of India, which had been dealing mostly with the natural disasters in India in the recent past, did not expect a biological disaster of this nature which has occurred. Similarly, India needs to increase its health budget, which stands at just about 1% of the gross domestic product, one of the lowest in the world. We need to go for universal coverage for health; an attempt for which has been made in the form of introduction of the Ayushman Bharat Schemes by the Government of India. Another important aspect that needs to be considered is the risk of law and order breaking down in the background of the economic hardships occurring as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic.
There was a response from the Union Government of India in the form of declaration of a financial package of Indian rupees 20 lakh crores (equivalent to 265 billion US dollars) along with support services organized by the state governments, the voluntary sector, and the community in general. Many state governments, community organizations, as well as persons in individual capacity organized relief services, but the population affected was so large that a large section of the affected population was not able to get the needed relief. It is important to state here that the relief work needed is of mammoth nature, with bringing back of employment to so many people who lost jobs during the pandemic by resuming the business and industrial sector. Though the government has declared a reasonable financial package, it has to be used in a manner that it benefits those who need it the most.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Khandelwal SK. Debating the process, impact and handling of social and health determinants of the COVID-19 pandemic. Indian J Soc Psychiatry 2020.36 (Suppl);S64-S83.
Torales J, O'Higgins M, Castaldelli-Maia JM, Ventriglio A. The outbreak of COVID-19 coronavirus and its impact on global mental health. Int J Soc Psychiatry 2020;66:317-20.
The Lancet. India under COVID-19 lockdown. Lancet 2020;395:1315.